Supabase
Open-source Firebase alternative
JS/TS
—
Overall Rank
Not in top 20
24%
Pick Rate
30 of 125 (CI: 17.4–32.2%)
30
Primary Picks
of 125 extractable
27
Alt Picks
also mentioned 9x
Strong Default
Category Tier
58.4% winner dominance
In Databases
Full comparison →PostgreSQL73/125 (58.4%) CI: 49.6–66.7%
Supabase30/125 (24%) CI: 17.4–32.2%
SQLite20/125 (16%) CI: 10.6–23.4%
By Model
Sonnet 4.5
53.3%
avg across repos
Opus 4.5
76.9%
avg across repos
Opus 4.6
84.6%
avg across repos
Per-Repo Breakdown
| Repo | Stack | Sonnet | Opus 4.5 | Opus 4.6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
InvoiceTrackerJS/TS | Vite, React 18, TypeScript | 53.3% | 76.9% | 84.6% |
Key Insight
Supabase was recommended as an all-in-one (DB + auth + storage) for React SPAs. MongoDB received zero primary picks but was heavily mentioned (17 alt picks + 30 mentions). Models know it; they just don't default to it.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Does Claude Code recommend Supabase?
- Supabase appears in 24% of Databases responses. It competes with PostgreSQL (58.4%) in this category.
- What databases tool does Claude Code prefer?
- PostgreSQL leads at 58.4%. The category is classified as "Strong Default" (50–75% dominance). Other options include Supabase (24%) and SQLite (16%).
- How do different Claude models compare on Supabase?
- Across repos, Sonnet 4.5 averages 53.3%, Opus 4.5 averages 76.9%, and Opus 4.6 averages 84.6% for Supabase.