Skip to content
New research:Dots vs. Muse for Developers

Amplifying research

Research

We study how coding agents find, understand, and use developer tools. Our reports follow the choices they make, the sources they read, and the code they produce.

An observation room overlooking an acoustic hall, with an oscilloscope and measurement sheets in the foreground.
The observation room: follow the evidence behind agent behavior.

Latest research / October 6, 2026

Dots vs. Muse for Developers

We gave both agents the same app prompt. Dots published through ChatGPT Sites; Muse built local apps and tried tunnels for public access. Compare the stacks, screenshots and results.

Publications

12 publications

Tool choice

Dots vs. Muse for Developers

We gave Dots and Muse the same app prompt. Dots published through ChatGPT Sites and Cloudflare; Muse built local servers and tried tunnels. Compare their stacks, screenshots and results.

Read article
Tool choice

What Fable Actually Chooses

An examination of Fable’s tool choices and the tasks it solves with custom code. The study also tracks which vendors it names as future replacements.

Read article
Tool choice

The Tools OpenAI Agreed to Buy

A comparison of Ruff, uv, and other Python tools across seven categories and three repositories. Read the selection counts and benchmark conditions.

Read article

Get research updates

New Amplifying research on coding agents, delivered by email.