Amplifying/ai-benchmarks

CI/CD

Near-Monopoly

162 extractable responses · Winner: GitHub Actions at 93.8%

Overall Breakdown

n=162 extractable responses.

GitHub Actions152/162 (93.8%) CI: 89–96.6%
Vercel CI10/162 (6.2%) CI: 3.4–11%

Also Recommended

Tools that appear as second-choice alternatives or mentions when a different tool is picked as primary. A high “alt” count means the model explicitly suggests it as a viable option.

ToolAlt picksMentionsTotal
Vercel231538
CircleCI141024
GitLab CI131427
GitHub Actions9615
Netlify71724
Jenkins6410
Travis CI279

By Stack

Tool preferences differ by language ecosystem. Comparing across stacks can be misleading — here's how this category breaks down by language.

JS/TS

JavaScript / TypeScript

3 repos
Vercel23.3% avg
PY

Python

1 repo

Model-by-Model Comparison

RepoSonnet 4.5Opus 4.5Opus 4.6
TaskFlowJS/TS
Next.js 14, TypeScript, App Router
DataPipelinePY
FastAPI, Python 3.11, Pydantic
InvoiceTrackerJS/TS
Vite, React 18, TypeScript
deployctlJS/TS
Node.js, TypeScript, Commander.js

Category Insight

GitHub Actions captured nearly every pick. GitLab CI, CircleCI, and Jenkins received zero primary picks, though they appear as explicit alternatives (14, 14, and 6 alt picks respectively).

Frequently Asked Questions

What ci/cd tool does Claude Code recommend?
GitHub Actions is the most-recommended ci/cd tool, appearing in 93.8% of responses. The runner-up is Vercel CI at 6.2%. This is based on 162 extractable responses across 4 project types.
Is ci/cd a settled or competitive market in AI recommendations?
CI/CD is classified as "Near-Monopoly" — one tool dominates with >75% of picks, leaving little room for alternatives.
Do different Claude models agree on ci/cd tools?
Yes — all three models (Sonnet 4.5, Opus 4.5, Opus 4.6) largely agree on GitHub Actions as the top ci/cd tool.

Browse CI/CD Tools

Related Categories