Yjs
CRDT framework for collaborative apps
—
Overall Rank
Not in top 20
0%
Pick Rate
0 of 72 (CI: 0–5.1%)
0
Primary Picks
of 72 extractable
Competitive
Category Tier
21% winner dominance
Fable 5 update, July 2026
What Fable Actually Chooses →In the newest edition (810 responses, model claude-fable-5), Yjs takes 2 primary picks, 0 alternative listings, and 1 mention. The Real-time winner in that edition is SSE at 40%.
In Real-time
Full comparison →Custom/DIY15/72 (20.8%) CI: 13.1–31.6%
Supabase Realtime11/72 (15.3%) CI: 8.8–25.3%
SSE10/72 (13.9%) CI: 7.7–23.7%
Socket.IO8/72 (11.1%) CI: 5.7–20.4%
By Model
Sonnet 4.5
0%
avg across repos
Opus 4.5
0%
avg across repos
Opus 4.6
0%
avg across repos
Key Insight
The most fragmented category. No tool dominates. Choice varies by use case: SSE for simple updates, Socket.IO for bidirectional, Liveblocks for collaboration.
Model Disagreement
The most fragmented category. Sonnet leads with SSE among 8 tools. Opus 4.6 spreads picks across 14, the widest distribution in the dataset.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Does Claude Code recommend Yjs?
- Yjs appears in 0% of Real-time responses. The category leader is Custom/DIY at 21%.
- What real-time tool does Claude Code prefer?
- Custom/DIY leads at 21%. The category is classified as "Competitive" (<50% dominance). Other options include Supabase Realtime (15.3%) and SSE (13.9%).
- How do different Claude models compare on Yjs?
- Across repos, Sonnet 4.5 averages 0%, Opus 4.5 averages 0%, and Opus 4.6 averages 0% for Yjs. Models disagree on this category: The most fragmented category. Sonnet leads with SSE among 8 tools. Opus 4.6 spreads picks across 14, the widest distribu...