Liveblocks
Real-time collaboration infrastructure
JS/TS
—
Overall Rank
Not in top 20
0%
Pick Rate
0 of 72 (CI: 0–5.1%)
0
Primary Picks
of 72 extractable
5
Alt Picks
also mentioned 8x
Competitive
Category Tier
21% winner dominance
In Real-time
Full comparison →Custom/DIY15/72 (20.8%) CI: 13.1–31.6%
Supabase Realtime11/72 (15.3%) CI: 8.8–25.3%
SSE10/72 (13.9%) CI: 7.7–23.7%
Socket.IO8/72 (11.1%) CI: 5.7–20.4%
By Model
Sonnet 4.5
0%
avg across repos
Opus 4.5
0%
avg across repos
Opus 4.6
14.3%
avg across repos
Per-Repo Breakdown
| Repo | Stack | Sonnet | Opus 4.5 | Opus 4.6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TaskFlowJS/TS | Next.js 14, TypeScript, App Router | — | — | 14.3% |
Key Insight
The most fragmented category. No tool dominates. Choice varies by use case: SSE for simple updates, Socket.IO for bidirectional, Liveblocks for collaboration.
Model Disagreement
The most fragmented category. Sonnet leads with SSE among 8 tools. Opus 4.6 spreads picks across 14, the widest distribution in the dataset.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Does Claude Code recommend Liveblocks?
- Liveblocks appears in 0% of Real-time responses. The category leader is Custom/DIY at 21%.
- What real-time tool does Claude Code prefer?
- Custom/DIY leads at 21%. The category is classified as "Competitive" (<50% dominance). Other options include Supabase Realtime (15.3%) and SSE (13.9%).
- How do different Claude models compare on Liveblocks?
- Across repos, Sonnet 4.5 averages 0%, Opus 4.5 averages 0%, and Opus 4.6 averages 14.3% for Liveblocks. Models disagree on this category: The most fragmented category. Sonnet leads with SSE among 8 tools. Opus 4.6 spreads picks across 14, the widest distribu...