Pino
Fast Node.js JSON logger
JS/TS
—
Overall Rank
Not in top 20
6.3%
Pick Rate
10 of 160 (CI: 3.4–11.1%)
10
Primary Picks
of 160 extractable
12
Alt Picks
also mentioned 3x
Strong Default
Category Tier
63.1% winner dominance
In Observability
Full comparison →Sentry101/160 (63.1%) CI: 55.4–70.2%
Custom/DIY35/160 (21.9%) CI: 16.2–28.9%
Prometheus12/160 (7.5%) CI: 4.3–12.7%
Pino10/160 (6.3%) CI: 3.4–11.1%
By Model
Sonnet 4.5
20%
avg across repos
Opus 4.5
0%
avg across repos
Opus 4.6
21.4%
avg across repos
Per-Repo Breakdown
| Repo | Stack | Sonnet | Opus 4.5 | Opus 4.6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TaskFlowJS/TS | Next.js 14, TypeScript, App Router | 20% | — | 21.4% |
Key Insight
Models frequently build logging/monitoring from scratch rather than reaching for a service.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Does Claude Code recommend Pino?
- Pino appears in 6.3% of Observability responses. The category leader is Sentry at 63.1%.
- What observability tool does Claude Code prefer?
- Sentry leads at 63.1%. The category is classified as "Strong Default" (50–75% dominance). Other options include Custom/DIY (21.9%) and Prometheus (7.5%).
- How do different Claude models compare on Pino?
- Across repos, Sonnet 4.5 averages 20%, Opus 4.5 averages 0%, and Opus 4.6 averages 21.4% for Pino.