Amplifying/ai-benchmarks

Styling

Strong Default

76 extractable responses · Winner: Tailwind CSS at 68.4%

Overall Breakdown

n=76 extractable responses.

Tailwind CSS52/76 (68.4%) CI: 57.3–77.8%
Custom/DIY13/76 (17.1%) CI: 10.3–27.1%
CSS Modules10/76 (13.2%) CI: 7.3–22.6%

Also Recommended

Tools that appear as second-choice alternatives or mentions when a different tool is picked as primary. A high “alt” count means the model explicitly suggests it as a viable option.

ToolAlt picksMentionsTotal
CSS Modules42951
styled-components143549
Tailwind CSS11415
Emotion32124
Sass5712
Vanilla Extract246

Model-by-Model Comparison

RepoSonnet 4.5Opus 4.5Opus 4.6
TaskFlowJS/TS
Next.js 14, TypeScript, App Router
Custom/DIY13.3%
InvoiceTrackerJS/TS
Vite, React 18, TypeScript
Custom/DIY41.7%
CSS Modules25%
Custom/DIY20%
CSS Modules13.3%
CSS Modules45.5%
Custom/DIY27.3%

Category Insight

styled-components, Emotion, and Sass were nearly absent from primary picks. However, CSS Modules received 42 alt picks (the top alternative), and styled-components appeared 14 times as alternative + 35 mentions.

Frequently Asked Questions

What styling tool does Claude Code recommend?
Tailwind CSS is the most-recommended styling tool, appearing in 68.4% of responses. The runner-up is Custom/DIY at 17.1%. This is based on 76 extractable responses across 4 project types.
Is styling a settled or competitive market in AI recommendations?
Styling is classified as "Strong Default" — one tool is the default with 50–75% of picks, but alternatives have meaningful share.
Do different Claude models agree on styling tools?
Yes — all three models (Sonnet 4.5, Opus 4.5, Opus 4.6) largely agree on Tailwind CSS as the top styling tool.

Browse Styling Tools

Related Categories